Optical Character Recognition (OCR) turns images of text—scans, smartphone photos, PDFs—into machine-readable strings and, increasingly, structured data. Modern OCR is a pipeline that cleans an image, finds text, reads it, and exports rich metadata so downstream systems can search, index, or extract fields. Two widely used output standards are hOCR, an HTML microformat for text and layout, and ALTO XML, a library/archives-oriented schema; both preserve positions, reading order, and other layout cues and are supported by popular engines like Tesseract.
Preprocessing. OCR quality starts with image cleanup: grayscale conversion, denoising, thresholding (binarization), and deskewing. Canonical OpenCV tutorials cover global, adaptive and Otsu thresholding—staples for documents with nonuniform lighting or bimodal histograms. When illumination varies within a page (think phone snaps), adaptive methods often outperform a single global threshold; Otsu automatically picks a threshold by analyzing the histogram. Tilt correction is equally important: Hough-based deskewing (Hough Line Transform) paired with Otsu binarization is a common and effective recipe in production preprocessing pipelines.
Detection vs. recognition. OCR is typically split into text detection (where is the text?) and text recognition (what does it say?). In natural scenes and many scans, fully convolutional detectors like EAST efficiently predict word- or line-level quadrilaterals without heavy proposal stages and are implemented in common toolkits (e.g., OpenCV’s text detection tutorial). On complex pages (newspapers, forms, books), segmentation of lines/regions and reading order inference matter:Kraken implements traditional zone/line segmentation and neural baseline segmentation, with explicit support for different scripts and directions (LTR/RTL/vertical).
Recognition models. The classic open-source workhorse Tesseract (open-sourced by Google, with roots at HP) evolved from a character classifier into an LSTM-based sequence recognizer and can emit searchable PDFs, hOCR/ALTO-friendly outputs, and more from the CLI. Modern recognizers rely on sequence modeling without pre-segmented characters. Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) remains foundational, learning alignments between input feature sequences and output label strings; it’s widely used in handwriting and scene-text pipelines.
In the last few years, Transformers reshaped OCR. TrOCR uses a vision Transformer encoder plus a text Transformer decoder, trained on large synthetic corpora then fine-tuned on real data, with strong performance across printed, handwritten and scene-text benchmarks (see also Hugging Face docs). In parallel, some systems sidestep OCR for downstream understanding: Donut (Document Understanding Transformer) is an OCR-free encoder-decoder that directly outputs structured answers (like key-value JSON) from document images (repo, model card), avoiding error accumulation when a separate OCR step feeds an IE system.
If you want batteries-included text reading across many scripts, EasyOCR offers a simple API with 80+ language models, returning boxes, text, and confidences—handy for prototypes and non-Latin scripts. For historical documents, Kraken shines with baseline segmentation and script-aware reading order; for flexible line-level training, Calamari builds on the Ocropy lineage (Ocropy) with (multi-)LSTM+CTC recognizers and a CLI for fine-tuning custom models.
Generalization hinges on data. For handwriting, the IAM Handwriting Database provides writer-diverse English sentences for training and evaluation; it’s a long-standing reference set for line and word recognition. For scene text, COCO-Text layered extensive annotations over MS-COCO, with labels for printed/handwritten, legible/illegible, script, and full transcriptions (see also the original project page). The field also relies heavily on synthetic pretraining: SynthText in the Wild renders text into photographs with realistic geometry and lighting, providing huge volumes of data to pretrain detectors and recognizers (reference code & data).
Competitions under ICDAR’s Robust Reading umbrella keep evaluation grounded. Recent tasks emphasize end-to-end detection/reading and include linking words into phrases, with official code reporting precision/recall/F-score, intersection-over-union (IoU), and character-level edit-distance metrics—mirroring what practitioners should track.
OCR rarely ends at plain text. Archives and digital libraries prefer ALTO XML because it encodes the physical layout (blocks/lines/words with coordinates) alongside content, and it pairs well with METS packaging. The hOCR microformat, by contrast, embeds the same idea into HTML/CSS using classes like ocr_line and ocrx_word, making it easy to display, edit, and transform with web tooling. Tesseract exposes both—e.g., generating hOCR or searchable PDFs directly from the CLI (PDF output guide); Python wrappers like pytesseract add convenience. Converters exist to translate between hOCR and ALTO when repositories have fixed ingestion standards—see this curated list of OCR file-format tools.
The strongest trend is convergence: detection, recognition, language modeling, and even task-specific decoding are merging into unified Transformer stacks. Pretraining on large synthetic corpora remains a force multiplier. OCR-free models will compete aggressively wherever the target is structured outputs rather than verbatim transcripts. Expect hybrid deployments too: a lightweight detector plus a TrOCR-style recognizer for long-form text, and a Donut-style model for forms and receipts.
Tesseract (GitHub) · Tesseract docs · hOCR spec · ALTO background · EAST detector · OpenCV text detection · TrOCR · Donut · COCO-Text · SynthText · Kraken · Calamari OCR · ICDAR RRC · pytesseract · IAM handwriting · OCR file-format tools · EasyOCR
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a technology used to convert different types of documents, such as scanned paper documents, PDF files or images captured by a digital camera, into editable and searchable data.
OCR works by scanning an input image or document, segmenting the image into individual characters, and comparing each character with a database of character shapes using pattern recognition or feature recognition.
OCR is used in a variety of sectors and applications, including digitizing printed documents, enabling text-to-speech services, automating data entry processes, and assisting visually impaired users to better interact with text.
While great advancements have been made in OCR technology, it isn't infallible. Accuracy can vary depending upon the quality of the original document and the specifics of the OCR software being used.
Although OCR is primarily designed for printed text, some advanced OCR systems are also able to recognize clear, consistent handwriting. However, typically handwriting recognition is less accurate because of the wide variation in individual writing styles.
Yes, many OCR software systems can recognize multiple languages. However, it's important to ensure that the specific language is supported by the software you're using.
OCR stands for Optical Character Recognition and is used for recognizing printed text, while ICR, or Intelligent Character Recognition, is more advanced and is used for recognizing hand-written text.
OCR works best with clear, easy-to-read fonts and standard text sizes. While it can work with various fonts and sizes, accuracy tends to decrease when dealing with unusual fonts or very small text sizes.
OCR can struggle with low-resolution documents, complex fonts, poorly printed texts, handwriting, and documents with backgrounds that interfere with the text. Also, while it can work with many languages, it may not cover every language perfectly.
Yes, OCR can scan colored text and backgrounds, although it's generally more effective with high-contrast color combinations, such as black text on a white background. The accuracy might decrease when text and background colors lack sufficient contrast.
The WBMP (Wireless Bitmap) image format is a monochrome graphics file format optimized for mobile computing devices with limited graphical and computational capabilities, such as early mobile phones and PDAs (Personal Digital Assistants). Introduced in the late 1990s, it was designed to provide an efficient means of transmitting graphical information over wireless networks, which, at the time, were significantly slower and less reliable than today's mobile internet connections. WBMP is part of the WAP (Wireless Application Protocol), a suite of protocols allowing mobile devices to access web content.
A WBMP image consists entirely of black and white pixels, with no support for grayscale or color. This stark limitation was a practical decision, reflecting the limited display capabilities of early mobile devices and the necessity of conserving bandwidth. Each pixel in a WBMP image can only be in one of two states: black or white. This binary nature simplifies the image data structure, making it more compact and easier to process on devices with limited resources.
The WBMP format follows a relatively simple structure, making it easy to parse and render on a wide array of devices. A WBMP file begins with a type field, indicating the type of image encoded. For standard WBMP files, this type field is set to 0, specifying a basic monochrome image. Following the type field, two multi-byte integer fields specify the width and height of the image, respectively. These are encoded using a variable-length format, which conservatively uses bandwidth by only consuming as many bytes as necessary to represent the dimensions.
After the header section, the body of a WBMP file contains the pixel data. Each pixel is represented by a single bit: 0 for white and 1 for black. Because of this, eight pixels can be packed into a single byte, making WBMP files exceptionally compact, especially when compared to more common formats like JPEG or PNG. This efficiency was crucial for devices and networks of the mobile era the WBMP was designed for, which often had strict limitations on data storage and transmission speeds.
One of the key strengths of the WBMP format is its simplicity. The format's minimalistic approach makes it highly efficient for the kinds of basic, icon-like images it was typically used to convey, such as logos, simple graphics, and stylized text. This efficiency extends to the processing required to display the images. Since the files are small and the format straightforward, decoding and rendering can be done quickly, even on hardware with very limited computational power. This made WBMP an ideal choice for the earliest generations of mobile devices, which often struggled with more complex or data-heavy image formats.
Despite its advantages for use in constrained environments, the WBMP format has significant limitations. The most obvious is its restriction to monochrome imagery, which inherently limits the scope of graphical content that can be effectively represented. As mobile device displays evolved to support full-color images and users' expectations for richer media content grew, the need for more versatile image formats became apparent. Additionally, the binary nature of WBMP images means that they lack the nuance and detail possible with grayscale or color images, making them unsuitable for more detailed graphics or photographs.
With the advancement of mobile technology and network infrastructure, the relevance of the WBMP format has declined. Modern smartphones boast powerful processors and high-resolution, color displays, far removed from the devices that the WBMP format was originally designed for. Similarly, today's mobile networks offer significantly higher data transmission speeds, making the transmission of more complex and data-heavy image formats like JPEG or PNG feasible, even for real-time web content. Consequently, the use of WBMP has largely been phased out in favor of these more capable formats.
Furthermore, the development of web standards and protocols has also contributed to the obsolescence of WBMP. The proliferation of HTML5 and CSS3 allows for much more sophisticated web content to be delivered to mobile devices, including vector graphics and images in formats with higher quality and color fidelity than WBMP could offer. With these technologies, web developers can create richly detailed, interactive content that adapts to a wide range of devices and screen sizes, further diminishing the practicality of using a format as limited as WBMP.
Despite its obsolescence, understanding the WBMP format offers valuable insights into the evolution of mobile computing and the ways in which technology constraints shape software and protocol design. The WBMP format is a prime example of how designers and engineers worked within the limitations of their time to create functional solutions. Its simplicity and efficiency reflect a period when bandwidth, processing power, and storage were at a premium, requiring innovative approaches to data compression and optimization.
In conclusion, the WBMP image format played a crucial role during a formative period in the development of mobile computing, offering a practical solution for transmitting and displaying simple graphical content on early mobile devices. Though it has largely been replaced by more versatile and capable image formats, it remains an important part of the history of mobile technology. It serves as a reminder of the constant evolution of technology, adapting to changing capabilities and user needs, and illustrates the importance of design considerations in developing protocols and formats that are both efficient and adaptable.
This converter runs entirely in your browser. When you select a file, it is read into memory and converted to the selected format. You can then download the converted file.
Conversions start instantly, and most files are converted in under a second. Larger files may take longer.
Your files are never uploaded to our servers. They are converted in your browser, and the converted file is then downloaded. We never see your files.
We support converting between all image formats, including JPEG, PNG, GIF, WebP, SVG, BMP, TIFF, and more.
This converter is completely free, and will always be free. Because it runs in your browser, we don't have to pay for servers, so we don't need to charge you.
Yes! You can convert as many files as you want at once. Just select multiple files when you add them.