Optical Character Recognition (OCR) turns images of text—scans, smartphone photos, PDFs—into machine-readable strings and, increasingly, structured data. Modern OCR is a pipeline that cleans an image, finds text, reads it, and exports rich metadata so downstream systems can search, index, or extract fields. Two widely used output standards are hOCR, an HTML microformat for text and layout, and ALTO XML, a library/archives-oriented schema; both preserve positions, reading order, and other layout cues and are supported by popular engines like Tesseract.
Preprocessing. OCR quality starts with image cleanup: grayscale conversion, denoising, thresholding (binarization), and deskewing. Canonical OpenCV tutorials cover global, adaptive and Otsu thresholding—staples for documents with nonuniform lighting or bimodal histograms. When illumination varies within a page (think phone snaps), adaptive methods often outperform a single global threshold; Otsu automatically picks a threshold by analyzing the histogram. Tilt correction is equally important: Hough-based deskewing (Hough Line Transform) paired with Otsu binarization is a common and effective recipe in production preprocessing pipelines.
Detection vs. recognition. OCR is typically split into text detection (where is the text?) and text recognition (what does it say?). In natural scenes and many scans, fully convolutional detectors like EAST efficiently predict word- or line-level quadrilaterals without heavy proposal stages and are implemented in common toolkits (e.g., OpenCV’s text detection tutorial). On complex pages (newspapers, forms, books), segmentation of lines/regions and reading order inference matter:Kraken implements traditional zone/line segmentation and neural baseline segmentation, with explicit support for different scripts and directions (LTR/RTL/vertical).
Recognition models. The classic open-source workhorse Tesseract (open-sourced by Google, with roots at HP) evolved from a character classifier into an LSTM-based sequence recognizer and can emit searchable PDFs, hOCR/ALTO-friendly outputs, and more from the CLI. Modern recognizers rely on sequence modeling without pre-segmented characters. Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) remains foundational, learning alignments between input feature sequences and output label strings; it’s widely used in handwriting and scene-text pipelines.
In the last few years, Transformers reshaped OCR. TrOCR uses a vision Transformer encoder plus a text Transformer decoder, trained on large synthetic corpora then fine-tuned on real data, with strong performance across printed, handwritten and scene-text benchmarks (see also Hugging Face docs). In parallel, some systems sidestep OCR for downstream understanding: Donut (Document Understanding Transformer) is an OCR-free encoder-decoder that directly outputs structured answers (like key-value JSON) from document images (repo, model card), avoiding error accumulation when a separate OCR step feeds an IE system.
If you want batteries-included text reading across many scripts, EasyOCR offers a simple API with 80+ language models, returning boxes, text, and confidences—handy for prototypes and non-Latin scripts. For historical documents, Kraken shines with baseline segmentation and script-aware reading order; for flexible line-level training, Calamari builds on the Ocropy lineage (Ocropy) with (multi-)LSTM+CTC recognizers and a CLI for fine-tuning custom models.
Generalization hinges on data. For handwriting, the IAM Handwriting Database provides writer-diverse English sentences for training and evaluation; it’s a long-standing reference set for line and word recognition. For scene text, COCO-Text layered extensive annotations over MS-COCO, with labels for printed/handwritten, legible/illegible, script, and full transcriptions (see also the original project page). The field also relies heavily on synthetic pretraining: SynthText in the Wild renders text into photographs with realistic geometry and lighting, providing huge volumes of data to pretrain detectors and recognizers (reference code & data).
Competitions under ICDAR’s Robust Reading umbrella keep evaluation grounded. Recent tasks emphasize end-to-end detection/reading and include linking words into phrases, with official code reporting precision/recall/F-score, intersection-over-union (IoU), and character-level edit-distance metrics—mirroring what practitioners should track.
OCR rarely ends at plain text. Archives and digital libraries prefer ALTO XML because it encodes the physical layout (blocks/lines/words with coordinates) alongside content, and it pairs well with METS packaging. The hOCR microformat, by contrast, embeds the same idea into HTML/CSS using classes like ocr_line and ocrx_word, making it easy to display, edit, and transform with web tooling. Tesseract exposes both—e.g., generating hOCR or searchable PDFs directly from the CLI (PDF output guide); Python wrappers like pytesseract add convenience. Converters exist to translate between hOCR and ALTO when repositories have fixed ingestion standards—see this curated list of OCR file-format tools.
The strongest trend is convergence: detection, recognition, language modeling, and even task-specific decoding are merging into unified Transformer stacks. Pretraining on large synthetic corpora remains a force multiplier. OCR-free models will compete aggressively wherever the target is structured outputs rather than verbatim transcripts. Expect hybrid deployments too: a lightweight detector plus a TrOCR-style recognizer for long-form text, and a Donut-style model for forms and receipts.
Tesseract (GitHub) · Tesseract docs · hOCR spec · ALTO background · EAST detector · OpenCV text detection · TrOCR · Donut · COCO-Text · SynthText · Kraken · Calamari OCR · ICDAR RRC · pytesseract · IAM handwriting · OCR file-format tools · EasyOCR
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a technology used to convert different types of documents, such as scanned paper documents, PDF files or images captured by a digital camera, into editable and searchable data.
OCR works by scanning an input image or document, segmenting the image into individual characters, and comparing each character with a database of character shapes using pattern recognition or feature recognition.
OCR is used in a variety of sectors and applications, including digitizing printed documents, enabling text-to-speech services, automating data entry processes, and assisting visually impaired users to better interact with text.
While great advancements have been made in OCR technology, it isn't infallible. Accuracy can vary depending upon the quality of the original document and the specifics of the OCR software being used.
Although OCR is primarily designed for printed text, some advanced OCR systems are also able to recognize clear, consistent handwriting. However, typically handwriting recognition is less accurate because of the wide variation in individual writing styles.
Yes, many OCR software systems can recognize multiple languages. However, it's important to ensure that the specific language is supported by the software you're using.
OCR stands for Optical Character Recognition and is used for recognizing printed text, while ICR, or Intelligent Character Recognition, is more advanced and is used for recognizing hand-written text.
OCR works best with clear, easy-to-read fonts and standard text sizes. While it can work with various fonts and sizes, accuracy tends to decrease when dealing with unusual fonts or very small text sizes.
OCR can struggle with low-resolution documents, complex fonts, poorly printed texts, handwriting, and documents with backgrounds that interfere with the text. Also, while it can work with many languages, it may not cover every language perfectly.
Yes, OCR can scan colored text and backgrounds, although it's generally more effective with high-contrast color combinations, such as black text on a white background. The accuracy might decrease when text and background colors lack sufficient contrast.
The PCX image format, standing for 'Picture Exchange,' is a raster graphics file format that was predominantly used on DOS and Windows-based computers in the late 1980s and 1990s. Developed by ZSoft Corporation, it was one of the first widely accepted formats for color images on IBM PC compatible computers. The PCX format is known for its simplicity and ease of implementation, which contributed to its widespread adoption in the early days of personal computing. It was particularly popular for its use in software such as Microsoft Paintbrush, which later became Microsoft Paint, and was also used for screen captures, scanner output, and desktop wallpapers.
The PCX file format is designed to represent scanned images and other types of pictorial data. It supports various color depths, including monochrome, 2-color, 4-color, 16-color, 256-color, and 24-bit true color images. The format allows for a range of resolutions and aspect ratios, making it versatile for different display devices and printing requirements. Despite its flexibility, the PCX format has been largely superseded by more modern image formats such as JPEG, PNG, and GIF, which offer better compression and color support. However, understanding the PCX format is still relevant for those dealing with legacy systems or digital archives that contain PCX files.
A PCX file consists of a header, image data, and an optional 256-color palette. The header is 128 bytes long and contains important information about the image, such as the version of the PCX format used, the image dimensions, the number of color planes, the number of bits per pixel per color plane, and the encoding method. The encoding method used in PCX files is run-length encoding (RLE), which is a simple form of lossless data compression that reduces the file size without sacrificing image quality. RLE works by compressing sequences of identical bytes into a single byte followed by a count byte, which indicates the number of times the byte should be repeated.
The image data in a PCX file is organized into planes, with each plane representing a different color component. For example, a 24-bit color image would have three planes, one each for the red, green, and blue components. The data within each plane is encoded using RLE and is stored in rows, with each row representing a horizontal line of pixels. The rows are stored from top to bottom, and within each row, the pixels are stored from left to right. For images with a color depth of less than 24 bits, an additional palette section may be present at the end of the file, which defines the colors used in the image.
The optional 256-color palette is a key feature of the PCX format for images with 8 bits per pixel or less. This palette is typically located at the end of the file, following the image data, and consists of a series of 3-byte entries, with each entry representing the red, green, and blue components of a single color. The palette allows for a wide range of colors to be represented in the image, even though each pixel only references a color index rather than storing the full color value. This indexed color approach is efficient in terms of file size, but it limits the color fidelity compared to true color images.
One of the advantages of the PCX format is its simplicity, which made it easy for developers to implement in their software. The format's header is fixed in size and layout, which allows for straightforward parsing and processing of the image data. Additionally, the RLE compression used in PCX files is relatively simple compared to more complex compression algorithms used in other formats. This simplicity meant that PCX files could be easily generated and manipulated on the limited hardware of the time, without the need for extensive processing power or memory.
Despite its simplicity, the PCX format does have some limitations. One of the main drawbacks is its lack of support for transparency or alpha channels, which are essential for modern graphics work such as icon design or video game graphics. Additionally, the RLE compression, while effective for certain types of images, is not as efficient as the compression algorithms used in formats like JPEG or PNG. This can result in larger file sizes for PCX files, especially when dealing with high-resolution or true color images.
Another limitation of the PCX format is its lack of support for metadata. Unlike formats such as TIFF or JPEG, which can include a wide range of metadata about the image, such as the camera settings used to capture a photograph or the date and time the image was created, PCX files contain only the most basic information necessary to display the image. This makes the format less suitable for professional photography or any application where retaining such information is important.
Despite these limitations, the PCX format was widely used in the past and is still recognized by many image editing and viewing programs today. Its legacy is evident in the continued support for the format in software such as Adobe Photoshop, GIMP, and CorelDRAW. For users working with older systems or needing to access historical digital content, the ability to handle PCX files remains relevant. Additionally, the format's simplicity makes it a useful case study for those learning about image file formats and data compression techniques.
The PCX format also played a role in the early days of desktop publishing and graphic design. Its support for multiple resolutions and color depths made it a flexible choice for creating and exchanging graphics between different software and hardware platforms. At a time when proprietary formats could create barriers to collaboration, the PCX format served as a common denominator that facilitated the sharing of images across different systems.
In terms of technical implementation, creating a PCX file involves writing the 128-byte header with the correct values for the image's properties, followed by the RLE-compressed image data for each color plane. If the image uses a palette, the palette data is appended to the end of the file. When reading a PCX file, the process is reversed: the header is read to determine the image properties, the RLE data is decompressed to reconstruct the image, and if present, the palette is read to map the color indices to their corresponding RGB values.
The PCX header contains several fields that are critical for interpreting the image data. These include the manufacturer (always set to 10 for ZSoft), the version (indicating the version of the PCX format), the encoding (always set to 1 for RLE compression), the bits per pixel (indicating the color depth), the image dimensions (given by the Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, and Ymax fields), the horizontal and vertical resolutions, the number of color planes, the bytes per line (indicating the number of bytes in each row of a color plane), and a flag for grayscale images, among others.
The PCX format's RLE compression is designed to be efficient for images with large areas of uniform color, which was common in the computer graphics of the time. For example, an image with a large blue sky could be compressed effectively because the blue pixels would be represented by a single byte followed by a count byte, rather than storing each blue pixel individually. However, for images with more complex patterns or color variations, RLE compression is less effective, and the resulting file size may not be significantly smaller than the uncompressed image.
In conclusion, the PCX image format is a historical file format that played a significant role in the early days of personal computing and digital graphics. Its simplicity and ease of implementation made it a popular choice for software developers and users alike. While it has been largely replaced by more advanced image formats, the PCX format remains an important part of the digital legacy and continues to be supported by many modern graphics applications. Understanding the PCX format provides valuable insights into the evolution of digital imaging technology and the challenges of data compression and file format design.
This converter runs entirely in your browser. When you select a file, it is read into memory and converted to the selected format. You can then download the converted file.
Conversions start instantly, and most files are converted in under a second. Larger files may take longer.
Your files are never uploaded to our servers. They are converted in your browser, and the converted file is then downloaded. We never see your files.
We support converting between all image formats, including JPEG, PNG, GIF, WebP, SVG, BMP, TIFF, and more.
This converter is completely free, and will always be free. Because it runs in your browser, we don't have to pay for servers, so we don't need to charge you.
Yes! You can convert as many files as you want at once. Just select multiple files when you add them.