Optical Character Recognition (OCR) turns images of text—scans, smartphone photos, PDFs—into machine-readable strings and, increasingly, structured data. Modern OCR is a pipeline that cleans an image, finds text, reads it, and exports rich metadata so downstream systems can search, index, or extract fields. Two widely used output standards are hOCR, an HTML microformat for text and layout, and ALTO XML, a library/archives-oriented schema; both preserve positions, reading order, and other layout cues and are supported by popular engines like Tesseract.
Preprocessing. OCR quality starts with image cleanup: grayscale conversion, denoising, thresholding (binarization), and deskewing. Canonical OpenCV tutorials cover global, adaptive and Otsu thresholding—staples for documents with nonuniform lighting or bimodal histograms. When illumination varies within a page (think phone snaps), adaptive methods often outperform a single global threshold; Otsu automatically picks a threshold by analyzing the histogram. Tilt correction is equally important: Hough-based deskewing (Hough Line Transform) paired with Otsu binarization is a common and effective recipe in production preprocessing pipelines.
Detection vs. recognition. OCR is typically split into text detection (where is the text?) and text recognition (what does it say?). In natural scenes and many scans, fully convolutional detectors like EAST efficiently predict word- or line-level quadrilaterals without heavy proposal stages and are implemented in common toolkits (e.g., OpenCV’s text detection tutorial). On complex pages (newspapers, forms, books), segmentation of lines/regions and reading order inference matter:Kraken implements traditional zone/line segmentation and neural baseline segmentation, with explicit support for different scripts and directions (LTR/RTL/vertical).
Recognition models. The classic open-source workhorse Tesseract (open-sourced by Google, with roots at HP) evolved from a character classifier into an LSTM-based sequence recognizer and can emit searchable PDFs, hOCR/ALTO-friendly outputs, and more from the CLI. Modern recognizers rely on sequence modeling without pre-segmented characters. Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) remains foundational, learning alignments between input feature sequences and output label strings; it’s widely used in handwriting and scene-text pipelines.
In the last few years, Transformers reshaped OCR. TrOCR uses a vision Transformer encoder plus a text Transformer decoder, trained on large synthetic corpora then fine-tuned on real data, with strong performance across printed, handwritten and scene-text benchmarks (see also Hugging Face docs). In parallel, some systems sidestep OCR for downstream understanding: Donut (Document Understanding Transformer) is an OCR-free encoder-decoder that directly outputs structured answers (like key-value JSON) from document images (repo, model card), avoiding error accumulation when a separate OCR step feeds an IE system.
If you want batteries-included text reading across many scripts, EasyOCR offers a simple API with 80+ language models, returning boxes, text, and confidences—handy for prototypes and non-Latin scripts. For historical documents, Kraken shines with baseline segmentation and script-aware reading order; for flexible line-level training, Calamari builds on the Ocropy lineage (Ocropy) with (multi-)LSTM+CTC recognizers and a CLI for fine-tuning custom models.
Generalization hinges on data. For handwriting, the IAM Handwriting Database provides writer-diverse English sentences for training and evaluation; it’s a long-standing reference set for line and word recognition. For scene text, COCO-Text layered extensive annotations over MS-COCO, with labels for printed/handwritten, legible/illegible, script, and full transcriptions (see also the original project page). The field also relies heavily on synthetic pretraining: SynthText in the Wild renders text into photographs with realistic geometry and lighting, providing huge volumes of data to pretrain detectors and recognizers (reference code & data).
Competitions under ICDAR’s Robust Reading umbrella keep evaluation grounded. Recent tasks emphasize end-to-end detection/reading and include linking words into phrases, with official code reporting precision/recall/F-score, intersection-over-union (IoU), and character-level edit-distance metrics—mirroring what practitioners should track.
OCR rarely ends at plain text. Archives and digital libraries prefer ALTO XML because it encodes the physical layout (blocks/lines/words with coordinates) alongside content, and it pairs well with METS packaging. The hOCR microformat, by contrast, embeds the same idea into HTML/CSS using classes like ocr_line and ocrx_word, making it easy to display, edit, and transform with web tooling. Tesseract exposes both—e.g., generating hOCR or searchable PDFs directly from the CLI (PDF output guide); Python wrappers like pytesseract add convenience. Converters exist to translate between hOCR and ALTO when repositories have fixed ingestion standards—see this curated list of OCR file-format tools.
The strongest trend is convergence: detection, recognition, language modeling, and even task-specific decoding are merging into unified Transformer stacks. Pretraining on large synthetic corpora remains a force multiplier. OCR-free models will compete aggressively wherever the target is structured outputs rather than verbatim transcripts. Expect hybrid deployments too: a lightweight detector plus a TrOCR-style recognizer for long-form text, and a Donut-style model for forms and receipts.
Tesseract (GitHub) · Tesseract docs · hOCR spec · ALTO background · EAST detector · OpenCV text detection · TrOCR · Donut · COCO-Text · SynthText · Kraken · Calamari OCR · ICDAR RRC · pytesseract · IAM handwriting · OCR file-format tools · EasyOCR
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a technology used to convert different types of documents, such as scanned paper documents, PDF files or images captured by a digital camera, into editable and searchable data.
OCR works by scanning an input image or document, segmenting the image into individual characters, and comparing each character with a database of character shapes using pattern recognition or feature recognition.
OCR is used in a variety of sectors and applications, including digitizing printed documents, enabling text-to-speech services, automating data entry processes, and assisting visually impaired users to better interact with text.
While great advancements have been made in OCR technology, it isn't infallible. Accuracy can vary depending upon the quality of the original document and the specifics of the OCR software being used.
Although OCR is primarily designed for printed text, some advanced OCR systems are also able to recognize clear, consistent handwriting. However, typically handwriting recognition is less accurate because of the wide variation in individual writing styles.
Yes, many OCR software systems can recognize multiple languages. However, it's important to ensure that the specific language is supported by the software you're using.
OCR stands for Optical Character Recognition and is used for recognizing printed text, while ICR, or Intelligent Character Recognition, is more advanced and is used for recognizing hand-written text.
OCR works best with clear, easy-to-read fonts and standard text sizes. While it can work with various fonts and sizes, accuracy tends to decrease when dealing with unusual fonts or very small text sizes.
OCR can struggle with low-resolution documents, complex fonts, poorly printed texts, handwriting, and documents with backgrounds that interfere with the text. Also, while it can work with many languages, it may not cover every language perfectly.
Yes, OCR can scan colored text and backgrounds, although it's generally more effective with high-contrast color combinations, such as black text on a white background. The accuracy might decrease when text and background colors lack sufficient contrast.
The PBM (Portable Bitmap) format is one of the simplest and earliest graphics file formats used for storing monochrome images. It is part of the Netpbm suite, which also includes PGM (Portable GrayMap) for grayscale images and PPM (Portable PixMap) for color images. The PBM format is designed to be extremely easy to read and write in a program, and to be clear and unambiguous. It is not intended to be a stand-alone format, but rather a lowest common denominator for converting between different image formats.
The PBM format supports only black and white (1-bit) images. Each pixel in the image is represented by a single bit – 0 for white and 1 for black. The simplicity of the format makes it straightforward to manipulate using basic text editing tools or programming languages without the need for specialized image processing libraries. However, this simplicity also means that PBM files can be larger than more sophisticated formats like JPEG or PNG, which use compression algorithms to reduce file size.
There are two variations of the PBM format: the ASCII (plain) format, known as P1, and the binary (raw) format, known as P4. The ASCII format is human-readable and can be created or edited with a simple text editor. The binary format is not human-readable but is more space-efficient and faster for programs to read and write. Despite the differences in storage, both formats represent the same type of image data and can be converted between each other without loss of information.
The structure of a PBM file in ASCII format begins with a two-byte magic number that identifies the file type. For PBM ASCII format, this is 'P1'. Following the magic number, there is whitespace (blanks, TABs, CRs, LFs), and then a width specification, which is the number of columns in the image, followed by more whitespace, and then a height specification, which is the number of rows in the image. After the height specification, there is more whitespace, and then the pixel data begins.
The pixel data in an ASCII PBM file consists of a series of '0's and '1's, with each '0' representing a white pixel and each '1' representing a black pixel. The pixels are arranged in rows, with each row of pixels on a new line. Whitespace is allowed anywhere in the pixel data except within a two-character sequence (it is not allowed between the two characters of the sequence). The end of the file is reached after reading width*height bits.
In contrast, the binary PBM format starts with a magic number of 'P4' instead of 'P1'. After the magic number, the format of the file is the same as the ASCII version until the pixel data begins. The binary pixel data is packed into bytes, with the most significant bit (MSB) of each byte representing the leftmost pixel, and each row of pixels padded as necessary to fill out the last byte. The padding bits are not significant and their values are ignored.
The binary format is more space-efficient because it uses a full byte to represent eight pixels, as opposed to the ASCII format which uses at least eight bytes (one character per pixel plus whitespace). However, the binary format is not human-readable and requires a program that understands the PBM format to display or edit the image.
Creating a PBM file programmatically is relatively simple. In a programming language like C, one would open a file in write mode, output the appropriate magic number, write the width and height as ASCII numbers separated by whitespace, and then output the pixel data. For an ASCII PBM, the pixel data can be written as a series of '0's and '1's with appropriate line breaks. For a binary PBM, the pixel data must be packed into bytes and written to the file in binary mode.
Reading a PBM file is also straightforward. A program would read the magic number to determine the format, skip the whitespace, read the width and height, skip more whitespace, and then read the pixel data. For an ASCII PBM, the program can read characters one at a time and interpret them as pixel values. For a binary PBM, the program must read bytes and unpack them into individual bits to get the pixel values.
The PBM format does not support any form of compression or encoding, which means that the file size is directly proportional to the number of pixels in the image. This can result in very large files for high-resolution images. However, the simplicity of the format makes it ideal for learning about image processing, for use in situations where image fidelity is more important than file size, or for use as an intermediary format in image conversion processes.
One of the advantages of the PBM format is its simplicity and the ease with which it can be manipulated. For example, to invert a PBM image (turn all black pixels white and vice versa), one can simply replace all '0's with '1's and all '1's with '0's in the pixel data. This can be done with a simple text processing script or program. Similarly, other basic image operations like rotation or mirroring can be implemented with simple algorithms.
Despite its simplicity, the PBM format is not widely used for general image storage or exchange. This is primarily due to its lack of compression, which makes it inefficient for storing large images or for use over the internet where bandwidth may be a concern. More modern formats like JPEG, PNG, and GIF offer various forms of compression and are better suited for these purposes. However, the PBM format is still used in some contexts, particularly for simple graphics in software development, and as a teaching tool for image processing concepts.
The Netpbm suite, which includes the PBM format, provides a collection of tools for manipulating PBM, PGM, and PPM files. These tools allow for conversion between the Netpbm formats and other popular image formats, as well as basic image processing operations like scaling, cropping, and color manipulation. The suite is designed to be easily extensible, with a simple interface for adding new functionality.
In conclusion, the PBM image format is a simple, no-frills file format for storing monochrome bitmap images. Its simplicity makes it easy to understand and manipulate, which can be advantageous for educational purposes or for simple image processing tasks. While it is not suitable for all applications due to its lack of compression and resulting large file sizes, it remains a useful format within the specific contexts where its strengths are most beneficial. The PBM format, along with the rest of the Netpbm suite, continues to be a valuable tool for those working with basic image processing and format conversion.
This converter runs entirely in your browser. When you select a file, it is read into memory and converted to the selected format. You can then download the converted file.
Conversions start instantly, and most files are converted in under a second. Larger files may take longer.
Your files are never uploaded to our servers. They are converted in your browser, and the converted file is then downloaded. We never see your files.
We support converting between all image formats, including JPEG, PNG, GIF, WebP, SVG, BMP, TIFF, and more.
This converter is completely free, and will always be free. Because it runs in your browser, we don't have to pay for servers, so we don't need to charge you.
Yes! You can convert as many files as you want at once. Just select multiple files when you add them.