Optical Character Recognition (OCR) turns images of text—scans, smartphone photos, PDFs—into machine-readable strings and, increasingly, structured data. Modern OCR is a pipeline that cleans an image, finds text, reads it, and exports rich metadata so downstream systems can search, index, or extract fields. Two widely used output standards are hOCR, an HTML microformat for text and layout, and ALTO XML, a library/archives-oriented schema; both preserve positions, reading order, and other layout cues and are supported by popular engines like Tesseract.
Preprocessing. OCR quality starts with image cleanup: grayscale conversion, denoising, thresholding (binarization), and deskewing. Canonical OpenCV tutorials cover global, adaptive and Otsu thresholding—staples for documents with nonuniform lighting or bimodal histograms. When illumination varies within a page (think phone snaps), adaptive methods often outperform a single global threshold; Otsu automatically picks a threshold by analyzing the histogram. Tilt correction is equally important: Hough-based deskewing (Hough Line Transform) paired with Otsu binarization is a common and effective recipe in production preprocessing pipelines.
Detection vs. recognition. OCR is typically split into text detection (where is the text?) and text recognition (what does it say?). In natural scenes and many scans, fully convolutional detectors like EAST efficiently predict word- or line-level quadrilaterals without heavy proposal stages and are implemented in common toolkits (e.g., OpenCV’s text detection tutorial). On complex pages (newspapers, forms, books), segmentation of lines/regions and reading order inference matter:Kraken implements traditional zone/line segmentation and neural baseline segmentation, with explicit support for different scripts and directions (LTR/RTL/vertical).
Recognition models. The classic open-source workhorse Tesseract (open-sourced by Google, with roots at HP) evolved from a character classifier into an LSTM-based sequence recognizer and can emit searchable PDFs, hOCR/ALTO-friendly outputs, and more from the CLI. Modern recognizers rely on sequence modeling without pre-segmented characters. Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) remains foundational, learning alignments between input feature sequences and output label strings; it’s widely used in handwriting and scene-text pipelines.
In the last few years, Transformers reshaped OCR. TrOCR uses a vision Transformer encoder plus a text Transformer decoder, trained on large synthetic corpora then fine-tuned on real data, with strong performance across printed, handwritten and scene-text benchmarks (see also Hugging Face docs). In parallel, some systems sidestep OCR for downstream understanding: Donut (Document Understanding Transformer) is an OCR-free encoder-decoder that directly outputs structured answers (like key-value JSON) from document images (repo, model card), avoiding error accumulation when a separate OCR step feeds an IE system.
If you want batteries-included text reading across many scripts, EasyOCR offers a simple API with 80+ language models, returning boxes, text, and confidences—handy for prototypes and non-Latin scripts. For historical documents, Kraken shines with baseline segmentation and script-aware reading order; for flexible line-level training, Calamari builds on the Ocropy lineage (Ocropy) with (multi-)LSTM+CTC recognizers and a CLI for fine-tuning custom models.
Generalization hinges on data. For handwriting, the IAM Handwriting Database provides writer-diverse English sentences for training and evaluation; it’s a long-standing reference set for line and word recognition. For scene text, COCO-Text layered extensive annotations over MS-COCO, with labels for printed/handwritten, legible/illegible, script, and full transcriptions (see also the original project page). The field also relies heavily on synthetic pretraining: SynthText in the Wild renders text into photographs with realistic geometry and lighting, providing huge volumes of data to pretrain detectors and recognizers (reference code & data).
Competitions under ICDAR’s Robust Reading umbrella keep evaluation grounded. Recent tasks emphasize end-to-end detection/reading and include linking words into phrases, with official code reporting precision/recall/F-score, intersection-over-union (IoU), and character-level edit-distance metrics—mirroring what practitioners should track.
OCR rarely ends at plain text. Archives and digital libraries prefer ALTO XML because it encodes the physical layout (blocks/lines/words with coordinates) alongside content, and it pairs well with METS packaging. The hOCR microformat, by contrast, embeds the same idea into HTML/CSS using classes like ocr_line and ocrx_word, making it easy to display, edit, and transform with web tooling. Tesseract exposes both—e.g., generating hOCR or searchable PDFs directly from the CLI (PDF output guide); Python wrappers like pytesseract add convenience. Converters exist to translate between hOCR and ALTO when repositories have fixed ingestion standards—see this curated list of OCR file-format tools.
The strongest trend is convergence: detection, recognition, language modeling, and even task-specific decoding are merging into unified Transformer stacks. Pretraining on large synthetic corpora remains a force multiplier. OCR-free models will compete aggressively wherever the target is structured outputs rather than verbatim transcripts. Expect hybrid deployments too: a lightweight detector plus a TrOCR-style recognizer for long-form text, and a Donut-style model for forms and receipts.
Tesseract (GitHub) · Tesseract docs · hOCR spec · ALTO background · EAST detector · OpenCV text detection · TrOCR · Donut · COCO-Text · SynthText · Kraken · Calamari OCR · ICDAR RRC · pytesseract · IAM handwriting · OCR file-format tools · EasyOCR
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a technology used to convert different types of documents, such as scanned paper documents, PDF files or images captured by a digital camera, into editable and searchable data.
OCR works by scanning an input image or document, segmenting the image into individual characters, and comparing each character with a database of character shapes using pattern recognition or feature recognition.
OCR is used in a variety of sectors and applications, including digitizing printed documents, enabling text-to-speech services, automating data entry processes, and assisting visually impaired users to better interact with text.
While great advancements have been made in OCR technology, it isn't infallible. Accuracy can vary depending upon the quality of the original document and the specifics of the OCR software being used.
Although OCR is primarily designed for printed text, some advanced OCR systems are also able to recognize clear, consistent handwriting. However, typically handwriting recognition is less accurate because of the wide variation in individual writing styles.
Yes, many OCR software systems can recognize multiple languages. However, it's important to ensure that the specific language is supported by the software you're using.
OCR stands for Optical Character Recognition and is used for recognizing printed text, while ICR, or Intelligent Character Recognition, is more advanced and is used for recognizing hand-written text.
OCR works best with clear, easy-to-read fonts and standard text sizes. While it can work with various fonts and sizes, accuracy tends to decrease when dealing with unusual fonts or very small text sizes.
OCR can struggle with low-resolution documents, complex fonts, poorly printed texts, handwriting, and documents with backgrounds that interfere with the text. Also, while it can work with many languages, it may not cover every language perfectly.
Yes, OCR can scan colored text and backgrounds, although it's generally more effective with high-contrast color combinations, such as black text on a white background. The accuracy might decrease when text and background colors lack sufficient contrast.
The JPEG 2000 image format, often abbreviated as JP2, is an image encoding system that was created as a successor to the original JPEG standard. It was developed by the Joint Photographic Experts Group committee in the early 2000s with the intention of providing a new image format that could overcome some of the limitations of the traditional JPEG format. JPEG 2000 is not to be confused with the standard JPEG format, which uses the .jpg or .jpeg file extension. JPEG 2000 uses the .jp2 extension for its files and offers a number of significant improvements over its predecessor, including better image quality at higher compression ratios, support for higher bit depths, and improved handling of transparency through alpha channels.
One of the key features of JPEG 2000 is its use of wavelet compression, as opposed to the discrete cosine transform (DCT) used in the original JPEG format. Wavelet compression is a form of data compression well-suited for image compression, where the size of the file is reduced without sacrificing quality. This is achieved by transforming the image into a wavelet domain where the image information is stored in a way that allows for varying levels of detail. This means that JPEG 2000 can offer both lossless and lossy compression within the same file format, providing flexibility depending on the needs of the user.
Another significant advantage of JPEG 2000 is its support for progressive decoding. This feature allows a low-resolution version of the image to be displayed while the file is still being downloaded, which can be particularly useful for web images. As more data is received, the image quality progressively improves until the full-resolution image is displayed. This is in contrast to the standard JPEG format, where the image can only be displayed after the entire file has been downloaded.
JPEG 2000 also introduces the concept of regions of interest (ROI). This allows different parts of an image to be compressed at different quality levels. For example, in a photograph of a person, the individual's face could be encoded with higher quality than the background. This selective quality control can be very useful in applications where certain parts of an image are more important than others.
The JPEG 2000 format is also highly scalable. It supports a wide range of image resolutions, color depths, and image components. This scalability extends to both spatial and quality dimensions, meaning that a single JPEG 2000 file can store multiple resolutions and quality levels, which can be extracted as needed for different applications or devices. This makes JPEG 2000 an excellent choice for a variety of uses, from digital cinema to medical imaging, where different users may require different image attributes.
In terms of color accuracy, JPEG 2000 supports up to 16 bits per color channel, compared to the 8 bits per channel in standard JPEG. This increased bit depth allows for a much wider range of colors and more subtle gradations between them, which is particularly important for high-end photo editing and printing where color fidelity is crucial.
JPEG 2000 also includes robust error resilience features, which make it more suitable for transmitting images over networks with a high risk of data corruption, such as wireless networks or the internet. The format can include checksums and other data integrity checks to ensure that the image can be reconstructed even if some data packets are lost during transmission.
Despite its many advantages, JPEG 2000 has not seen widespread adoption compared to the original JPEG format. One reason for this is the complexity of the JPEG 2000 compression algorithm, which requires more computational power to encode and decode images. This has made it less attractive for consumer electronics and web platforms, which often prioritize speed and simplicity. Additionally, the original JPEG format is deeply entrenched in the industry and has a vast ecosystem of software and hardware support, making it difficult for a new format to gain a foothold.
Another factor that has limited the adoption of JPEG 2000 is the issue of patents. The JPEG 2000 standard includes technologies that were patented by various entities, and this has led to concerns about licensing fees and legal constraints. Although many of these patents have expired or have been made available on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, the initial uncertainty contributed to the reluctance of some organizations to adopt the format.
Despite these challenges, JPEG 2000 has found a niche in certain professional fields where its advanced features are particularly valuable. For example, in digital cinema, JPEG 2000 is used as part of the Digital Cinema Initiatives (DCI) specification for the distribution and projection of films. Its high-quality image representation and scalability make it well-suited for the demands of high-resolution movie screens.
In the realm of archival and digital preservation, JPEG 2000 is also favored for its lossless compression capabilities and its ability to store images in a way that is both efficient and conducive to long-term preservation. Libraries, museums, and other institutions that require high-quality digital copies of their collections often choose JPEG 2000 for these reasons.
The medical imaging industry is another area where JPEG 2000 has been successfully implemented. The format's support for high bit depths and lossless compression is essential for ensuring that medical images, such as X-rays and MRI scans, retain all the necessary detail for accurate diagnosis and analysis. Additionally, the ability to handle very large image files efficiently makes JPEG 2000 a good fit for this sector.
JPEG 2000 also includes a rich set of metadata capabilities, allowing for the embedding of extensive information within the image file itself. This can include copyright information, camera settings, geolocation data, and more. This feature is particularly useful for asset management systems and other applications where tracking the provenance and properties of an image is important.
In conclusion, the JPEG 2000 image format offers a range of advanced features that provide significant benefits in terms of image quality, flexibility, and robustness. Its use of wavelet compression allows for high-quality images at lower file sizes, and its support for progressive decoding, regions of interest, and scalability make it a versatile choice for many applications. While it has not replaced the original JPEG format in mainstream use, JPEG 2000 has become the format of choice in industries where its unique advantages are most needed. As technology continues to advance and the need for higher-quality digital imaging grows, JPEG 2000 may yet see broader adoption in the future.
This converter runs entirely in your browser. When you select a file, it is read into memory and converted to the selected format. You can then download the converted file.
Conversions start instantly, and most files are converted in under a second. Larger files may take longer.
Your files are never uploaded to our servers. They are converted in your browser, and the converted file is then downloaded. We never see your files.
We support converting between all image formats, including JPEG, PNG, GIF, WebP, SVG, BMP, TIFF, and more.
This converter is completely free, and will always be free. Because it runs in your browser, we don't have to pay for servers, so we don't need to charge you.
Yes! You can convert as many files as you want at once. Just select multiple files when you add them.