Optical Character Recognition (OCR) turns images of text—scans, smartphone photos, PDFs—into machine-readable strings and, increasingly, structured data. Modern OCR is a pipeline that cleans an image, finds text, reads it, and exports rich metadata so downstream systems can search, index, or extract fields. Two widely used output standards are hOCR, an HTML microformat for text and layout, and ALTO XML, a library/archives-oriented schema; both preserve positions, reading order, and other layout cues and are supported by popular engines like Tesseract.
Preprocessing. OCR quality starts with image cleanup: grayscale conversion, denoising, thresholding (binarization), and deskewing. Canonical OpenCV tutorials cover global, adaptive and Otsu thresholding—staples for documents with nonuniform lighting or bimodal histograms. When illumination varies within a page (think phone snaps), adaptive methods often outperform a single global threshold; Otsu automatically picks a threshold by analyzing the histogram. Tilt correction is equally important: Hough-based deskewing (Hough Line Transform) paired with Otsu binarization is a common and effective recipe in production preprocessing pipelines.
Detection vs. recognition. OCR is typically split into text detection (where is the text?) and text recognition (what does it say?). In natural scenes and many scans, fully convolutional detectors like EAST efficiently predict word- or line-level quadrilaterals without heavy proposal stages and are implemented in common toolkits (e.g., OpenCV’s text detection tutorial). On complex pages (newspapers, forms, books), segmentation of lines/regions and reading order inference matter:Kraken implements traditional zone/line segmentation and neural baseline segmentation, with explicit support for different scripts and directions (LTR/RTL/vertical).
Recognition models. The classic open-source workhorse Tesseract (open-sourced by Google, with roots at HP) evolved from a character classifier into an LSTM-based sequence recognizer and can emit searchable PDFs, hOCR/ALTO-friendly outputs, and more from the CLI. Modern recognizers rely on sequence modeling without pre-segmented characters. Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) remains foundational, learning alignments between input feature sequences and output label strings; it’s widely used in handwriting and scene-text pipelines.
In the last few years, Transformers reshaped OCR. TrOCR uses a vision Transformer encoder plus a text Transformer decoder, trained on large synthetic corpora then fine-tuned on real data, with strong performance across printed, handwritten and scene-text benchmarks (see also Hugging Face docs). In parallel, some systems sidestep OCR for downstream understanding: Donut (Document Understanding Transformer) is an OCR-free encoder-decoder that directly outputs structured answers (like key-value JSON) from document images (repo, model card), avoiding error accumulation when a separate OCR step feeds an IE system.
If you want batteries-included text reading across many scripts, EasyOCR offers a simple API with 80+ language models, returning boxes, text, and confidences—handy for prototypes and non-Latin scripts. For historical documents, Kraken shines with baseline segmentation and script-aware reading order; for flexible line-level training, Calamari builds on the Ocropy lineage (Ocropy) with (multi-)LSTM+CTC recognizers and a CLI for fine-tuning custom models.
Generalization hinges on data. For handwriting, the IAM Handwriting Database provides writer-diverse English sentences for training and evaluation; it’s a long-standing reference set for line and word recognition. For scene text, COCO-Text layered extensive annotations over MS-COCO, with labels for printed/handwritten, legible/illegible, script, and full transcriptions (see also the original project page). The field also relies heavily on synthetic pretraining: SynthText in the Wild renders text into photographs with realistic geometry and lighting, providing huge volumes of data to pretrain detectors and recognizers (reference code & data).
Competitions under ICDAR’s Robust Reading umbrella keep evaluation grounded. Recent tasks emphasize end-to-end detection/reading and include linking words into phrases, with official code reporting precision/recall/F-score, intersection-over-union (IoU), and character-level edit-distance metrics—mirroring what practitioners should track.
OCR rarely ends at plain text. Archives and digital libraries prefer ALTO XML because it encodes the physical layout (blocks/lines/words with coordinates) alongside content, and it pairs well with METS packaging. The hOCR microformat, by contrast, embeds the same idea into HTML/CSS using classes like ocr_line and ocrx_word, making it easy to display, edit, and transform with web tooling. Tesseract exposes both—e.g., generating hOCR or searchable PDFs directly from the CLI (PDF output guide); Python wrappers like pytesseract add convenience. Converters exist to translate between hOCR and ALTO when repositories have fixed ingestion standards—see this curated list of OCR file-format tools.
The strongest trend is convergence: detection, recognition, language modeling, and even task-specific decoding are merging into unified Transformer stacks. Pretraining on large synthetic corpora remains a force multiplier. OCR-free models will compete aggressively wherever the target is structured outputs rather than verbatim transcripts. Expect hybrid deployments too: a lightweight detector plus a TrOCR-style recognizer for long-form text, and a Donut-style model for forms and receipts.
Tesseract (GitHub) · Tesseract docs · hOCR spec · ALTO background · EAST detector · OpenCV text detection · TrOCR · Donut · COCO-Text · SynthText · Kraken · Calamari OCR · ICDAR RRC · pytesseract · IAM handwriting · OCR file-format tools · EasyOCR
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a technology used to convert different types of documents, such as scanned paper documents, PDF files or images captured by a digital camera, into editable and searchable data.
OCR works by scanning an input image or document, segmenting the image into individual characters, and comparing each character with a database of character shapes using pattern recognition or feature recognition.
OCR is used in a variety of sectors and applications, including digitizing printed documents, enabling text-to-speech services, automating data entry processes, and assisting visually impaired users to better interact with text.
While great advancements have been made in OCR technology, it isn't infallible. Accuracy can vary depending upon the quality of the original document and the specifics of the OCR software being used.
Although OCR is primarily designed for printed text, some advanced OCR systems are also able to recognize clear, consistent handwriting. However, typically handwriting recognition is less accurate because of the wide variation in individual writing styles.
Yes, many OCR software systems can recognize multiple languages. However, it's important to ensure that the specific language is supported by the software you're using.
OCR stands for Optical Character Recognition and is used for recognizing printed text, while ICR, or Intelligent Character Recognition, is more advanced and is used for recognizing hand-written text.
OCR works best with clear, easy-to-read fonts and standard text sizes. While it can work with various fonts and sizes, accuracy tends to decrease when dealing with unusual fonts or very small text sizes.
OCR can struggle with low-resolution documents, complex fonts, poorly printed texts, handwriting, and documents with backgrounds that interfere with the text. Also, while it can work with many languages, it may not cover every language perfectly.
Yes, OCR can scan colored text and backgrounds, although it's generally more effective with high-contrast color combinations, such as black text on a white background. The accuracy might decrease when text and background colors lack sufficient contrast.
The JNG (JPEG Network Graphics) format is an image file format that was designed as a sub-format of the more widely known MNG (Multiple-image Network Graphics) format. It was primarily developed to provide a solution for lossy and lossless compression within a single image format, which was not possible with other common formats such as JPEG or PNG at the time of its creation. JNG files are typically used for images that require both a high-quality, photographic-style representation and an optional alpha channel for transparency, which is not supported by standard JPEG images.
JNG is not a standalone format but is part of the MNG file format suite, which was designed to be the animated version of PNG. The MNG suite includes both MNG and JNG formats, with MNG supporting animations and JNG being a single-image format. The JNG format was created by the same team that developed the PNG format, and it was intended to complement PNG by adding JPEG-compressed color data while maintaining the possibility of a separate alpha channel, which is a feature that PNG supports but JPEG does not.
The structure of a JNG file is similar to that of a MNG file, but it is simpler since it is intended for single images only. A JNG file consists of a series of chunks, each of which contains a specific type of data. The most important chunks in a JNG file are the JHDR chunk, which contains the header information; the JDAT chunk, which contains the JPEG-compressed image data; the JSEP chunk, which may be present to indicate the end of the JPEG data stream; and the alpha channel chunks, which are optional and can be either IDAT chunks (containing PNG-compressed alpha data) or JDAA chunks (containing JPEG-compressed alpha data).
The JHDR chunk is the first chunk in a JNG file and is critical as it defines the properties of the image. It includes information such as the image's width and height, color depth, whether an alpha channel is present, the color space used, and the compression method for the alpha channel. This chunk allows decoders to understand how to process the subsequent data within the file.
The JDAT chunk contains the actual image data, which is compressed using the JPEG standard compression techniques. This compression allows for efficient storage of photographic images, which often contain complex color gradients and subtle variations in tone. The JPEG compression within JNG is identical to that used in standalone JPEG files, making it possible for standard JPEG decoders to read the image data from a JNG file without needing to understand the entire JNG format.
If an alpha channel is present in the JNG image, it is stored in either IDAT or JDAA chunks. The IDAT chunks are the same as those used in PNG files and contain PNG-compressed alpha data. This allows for lossless compression of the alpha channel, ensuring that transparency information is preserved without any quality loss. The JDAA chunks, on the other hand, contain JPEG-compressed alpha data, which allows for smaller file sizes at the cost of potential lossy compression artifacts in the alpha channel.
The JSEP chunk is an optional chunk that signals the end of the JPEG data stream. It is useful in cases where the JNG file is being streamed over a network, and the decoder needs to know when to stop reading JPEG data and start looking for alpha channel data. This chunk is not required if the file is being read from a local storage medium where the end of the JPEG data can be determined from the file structure itself.
JNG also supports color correction by including an ICCP chunk, which contains an embedded ICC color profile. This profile allows for accurate color representation across different devices and is particularly important for images that will be viewed on a variety of screens or printed. The inclusion of color management capabilities is a significant advantage of the JNG format over standalone JPEG files, which do not inherently support embedded color profiles.
Despite its capabilities, the JNG format has not seen widespread adoption. This is partly due to the dominance of the JPEG format for photographic images and the PNG format for images requiring transparency. Additionally, the rise of formats like WebP and HEIF, which also support both lossy and lossless compression as well as transparency, has further reduced the need for a separate format like JNG. However, JNG remains a viable option for specific use cases where its unique combination of features is required.
One of the reasons for the lack of widespread adoption of JNG is the complexity of the MNG file format suite. While JNG itself is relatively simple, it is part of a larger and more complex set of specifications that were not widely implemented. Many software developers chose to support the simpler and more popular JPEG and PNG formats instead, which met most users' needs without the additional complexity of MNG and JNG.
Another factor that has limited the adoption of JNG is the lack of support in popular image editing and viewing software. While some specialized software may support JNG, many of the most commonly used programs do not. This lack of support means that users and developers are less likely to encounter or use JNG files, further diminishing its presence in the marketplace.
Despite these challenges, JNG does have its proponents, particularly among those who appreciate its technical capabilities. For instance, JNG can be useful in applications where a single file needs to contain both a high-quality photographic image and a separate alpha channel for transparency. This can be important in graphic design, game development, and other fields where images need to be composited against various backgrounds.
The technical design of JNG also allows for potential optimizations in file size and quality. For example, by separating the color and alpha data, it is possible to apply different levels of compression to each, optimizing for the best balance between file size and image quality. This can result in smaller files than if a single compression method were applied to the entire image, as is the case with formats like PNG.
In conclusion, the JNG image format is a specialized file format that offers a unique combination of features, including support for both lossy and lossless compression, an optional alpha channel for transparency, and color management capabilities. While it has not achieved widespread adoption, it remains a technically capable format that may be suitable for specific applications. Its future relevance will likely depend on whether there is a renewed interest in its capabilities and whether software support for the format expands. For now, JNG stands as a testament to the ongoing evolution of image formats and the search for the perfect balance of compression, quality, and functionality.
This converter runs entirely in your browser. When you select a file, it is read into memory and converted to the selected format. You can then download the converted file.
Conversions start instantly, and most files are converted in under a second. Larger files may take longer.
Your files are never uploaded to our servers. They are converted in your browser, and the converted file is then downloaded. We never see your files.
We support converting between all image formats, including JPEG, PNG, GIF, WebP, SVG, BMP, TIFF, and more.
This converter is completely free, and will always be free. Because it runs in your browser, we don't have to pay for servers, so we don't need to charge you.
Yes! You can convert as many files as you want at once. Just select multiple files when you add them.